It is intriguing to observe in the US
the rise of the atheism movement. So much so, that on Saturday there was an
Atheists rally in in Washington with Richard Dawkins as the main event—the so-called
“Reason Rally.” This was followed by the American Atheists’ annual convention.
They are the ones who put up billboards stating “You KNOW it’s a myth. This
Season, Celebrate Reason.”
The organiser David Silverman was raised
Jewish but rejected the faith of his heritage and is now president of the
American Atheists. He calls the event the atheists “coming out,” intentionally
using the language of the gay rights movement. They see themselves as an
oppressed minority and are uniting to have a more public voice—why not? Free
speech is essential to western culture.
At the rally he stated “we will never
be closeted again.” He states, “I respect people; I respect humans. I do not
respect religion.” Mmmm. Sounds rather contradictory. In fact, it would make a
good Tui’s sign. Still, I am sure he is sincere. He and his organisation is
determined to challenge the placing of bibles in hotel rooms, the raising of
crosses and stopping of anything that brings religion into the public sphere.
The rally went ahead, but it rained,
which raises a very intriguing question—was it God who made it rain? Or nature?
Or God working in nature? I am sure it is one of the above.
At the rally, Taslima Nasrin, the
author of “Shame” described Mohammed as a charlatan, a pedophile and a
rapist—good luck with that! A wooden cross was placed in the middle of the
crowd with a sign saying—“banish the 10 commandments in the dustbin of
history.” I would have thought a good number of the 10 Commandments are pretty
good e.g. do not commit adultery, do not kill, honour your mum and dad, etc.
They have been quite good at helping shape western civilisation in particular.
I suppose it is the first four that offend, the God-stuff. Personally, I like
the summaries: love God with all you have, love your neighbour as yourself. If
you don’t like the first, surely the second can be said to be “not bad.”
Some American Christians are responding
very negatively. One US leader has called them vicious and that they stand for
nothing.
I have a different view. While I do not
agree with or get atheism, I think this movement has some positives for the
Christian faith. First, it raises in public the question of God
or no God and forces people to think and give a more reasonable defence of the
faith. In fact, I think it is a strategic mistake to go public like this; it
gives us Christians something real to present the gospel against. It also brings
religion into the public arena, which of course is what secularism and atheism
want to stop. One of the problems in western society for Christians is that
everything is so grey and this changes things by giving a public sounding board
for the faith. This is one of the reasons we see so much religious language in
the American election—a “war” is on for the soul of America, a very public “war”.
Secondly, one of the reasons they
despise religion is its corruption, hypocrisy, and involvement in violence. I
accept that they have more than a point on this. There is no shortage of ammo
for them! This should inspire us Christians not to react, but to live more
peaceful, honest and loving lives—to walk the talk. It should encourage us to
renounce the sort of extremism we see in some parts of the church and
especially religious terrorism and violence. We need to ensure that we are not
hypocrites. Many people in western countries need to see Christianity then they
might listen again to its message. One way we can do this is give those who
oppose us the honour of our respect and allow them the space to believe
differently. One of the reasons atheists are responding like this is because
they are in many cases, marginalised. Jesus was the friend of those at the
margins, so we should be.
Thirdly, we can take the opportunity to
expose the “logical” contradictions of atheism. The biggest problems atheism has
are, first, ‘what got the ball rolling in creation?’—the problem of all we know
and experience coming from nothing; ‘is something as complex as this creation
really explainable through natural means?—the problem of the clear evidence of
amazing order and design. God is our answer to both questions. Atheists have no
answers that work, that this all emerged by chance and “natural processes” is
hardly any more reasonable than the God-hypothesis. When atheists can give
a rational alternative to these questions, then I and the majority of people in
the world who do in fact believe in some God or gods might start to take it
more seriously. (Of course at this point an atheist will likely say but God is
not a rational answer. In a sense they are right. But, we don’t need a rational
answer as we don’t have to play by their “reason” rules, as we don’t claim that
God is knowable rationally—he is knowable through revelation and yet unknowable
because he is beyond knowing in that rational sense. That is why we talk past
each other so much. Then again, is it “rational” to argue for “no cause”?).
I also think we need to remind atheists
and secularists that the removal of religion from the public sphere is not
neutral—it is as biased as a world full of crosses or Muslim crescents. It would
be neutral if such signs and symbols had never existed—but they have, so removing
them is not neutral, it is an act of belief and cultural imperialism. It
declares that there is no God and no religion and promulgates an alternative “religion”,
atheism. The thing is, there is no neutral position, as Bob Dylan says “you’ve
got to serve somebody.” So, they will meet strong resistance in trying to stop
public expressions of faith. I mean, why can’t you put up a cross? They
shouldn’t care as much. Personally, I am an advocate of the separation of
atheism and the state—joking. They too can put up their signs etc. Let the
people decide what they believe.
So, overall, it may turn out over time
to be a good thing. It will certainly raise the discussion. The modern atheist movement,
like extreme Islam, and increasing moral decay, gives us something to present
the Jesus’ story against. When everything is grey, the light of the gospel is
hard to see. The world is getting darker, and that gives us a growing new
opportunity. We need to all arm ourselves with tools to raise questions of
atheism—and more importantly, listen, learn and show them love.
Comments
God will certainly use this for good if we let him and don't try and take over from God what needs to happen like you say we need to let christianity be seen.
Would I go to war over the removal of all the crosses atop all the churches in the world, no. Would I cry, yes. But after that my time would be better spent living a life of witness to replace that concrete symbol and spending my time on my knees.
None of which I do enough of.
These people do not anger me, they just make me sad for they stand of nothing affirmative, all their actions are negative.
There are plenty of people and churches already being true salt and light (many of whom are very intelligent) in the USA. Why wait until it is darker? Isn't it already very dark there?! I say it is! To wait until the US is dark so light will shine brighter is foolish talk. Darkness is still powerful and if left unattended is asking for fire to rain down and leave a number of salt pillars to outline its depravity. Is that what a Christian should desire?
Have we forgotten that the disciples were crucified for their belief? I certainly don't want a "anything goes" state of non-law. I most certainly don't want to 'have to die' for my beliefs to become "brighter light" - which is inevitably where this will lead if left to go it's "natural" course". The West is already embracing unscientific, unreasonable philosopher Richard Dawkins as god, fully believing his lies. Almost every home I go into, I see his book on the shelve, with no other reasonable book discussing anything to do with real truth or history in sight. The battle is spiritual, and to take a cross away from public eye is to help ease their conscience (which it will to some degree) but of course never can. Sure, let us all live out the bread and wine of life like the Salvo's, but take a physical stand against things like the removal of the public identity of which Paul boasts above all! (the cross). Let us not back down like cowards. The early church changed every pagan symbol into something public to reflect on Christ (everything becoming cross-centered) and now we think it is fine to let everything go back to paganism? Don't we care that our children will have far more influence to become pagan themselves? Isn't the evolutionary religion in schools bad enough? The church worked so hard to have a bible in every hand and hotel, and also bible in schools etc... now we are all "PC" and let the majority rule, let the things of this world blind our neighbours.
The answer is to stand up NOW for truth and declare it boldly everywhere. Anything else, is a light in our office: all talk.
Feel free to surf to my web blog - http://www.ipodobserver.com
Feel free to visit my web-site; http://camotruck.net/phpBB2/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4216&sid=1417f8e9adadaef277aef35827c9ce30
My site: sterling silver toe ring
Also visit my website: http://www.greenbuildconsult.com
Fеel frеe to suгf to mу webpagе: Leaf Necklace
My web page; Pretty Jewels for Girls
Also see my webpage - Pretty Jewels for Girls