So Bob Jones wants the National Anthem ditched (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10850117).It is great that he lives in a country where he can freely state this opinion without fear of reprisal from the State or someone else with vested interest. I wonder why that is?
Bob clearly set out to offend when he wrote the article. He begins by slamming the Australian song, claiming that Australia is not “young and free.” His basis is that Australia, NZ etc. are actually old nations in world terms. Well, in strict socio-political terms he may be right, but he misses the point. When one sings an anthem like this, one is not singing the latest pop song expressing how things are now, one sings a song that speaks of the founding principles of a nation, those ideals upon which the nation is built. It expresses the desire and sense of the nation then. It functions as a reminder, a link with history, our forebears giving their all to establish a people and singing a song that encapsulates present hope and future dreams. It works to stop us renouncing those cherished values—which is exactly what Bob wants us all to do. For what Bob? Materialism?
He then has a crack at the “bloody haka” as a “national embarrassment.” Really Bob? An embarrassment? Isn’t it rather glorious that the people of NZ have embraced Māori culture to the point that we are defined as much by the haka as by the anthem. Sure, it is overdone at times. But come on. I think it is a sign of our progress to finding our identity and unity as a nation that the “glorious haka” is now a central symbol of our life. Bob sounds like a tired old Euro-centric modernist to me.
He then turns his attention to the anthem. He seems annoyed with the manner of choosing the anthem, through a contest in an Australian-owned paper decided by Australians and Germans. Here we have more than another tinge of racism; after all, our history is intertwined with Australia and the colonialists came from Europe. The mundane name “Bob Jones” proves the point.
His diatribe pauses to slam God save the Queen because it lacks an object, “from what?” Here we of course have a case of metonymy whereby “Queen” represents the monarch and her people, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. It includes us actually. “From what?” Are you serious Bob? A glance over history suggests things like wars (remember Hitler?), economic recession, plague, oppressive rule, and more. We need God’s help now as much as ever.
His problems with the anthem are first, that it’s over the top lyrics. Personally, I love the lyrics, they express great hope. What is wrong with expressing our dreams for a blessed nation that is good and great, characterised by love, truth, freedom, peace, racial unity, honor and prosperity, and that we do not fall prey to dissension, envy, hate, and corruption? Bob seems to find the anthem boastful. It is not, it is a prayer that we will be great, an expression of human desire for the things listed above.
Bob is upset about our failure to uphold peace. Here he has a point. But rather than us then ditching the anthem, why not ditch violence and try and live the anthem and its desires? If we haven’t lived up to it, instead of abandoning it and settling for something less, shouldn’t we then sing it more in the hope that we get its point and work even harder for peace?
Then Bob gets to his real issue, the God-talk in the Anthem. For Bob, God is a “mythical entity” and embarrassing. For an atheist, I suppose it would be. He quotes Einstein, “religion is simply childish.
Well it may come as a surprise to Bob, that there are many scientists who beg to differ from Einstein. Furthermore, the majority of the world remains childish and believes in the myth (http://www.laidlaw.ac.nz/_blog/Our_Blog/post/Should_We_Be_So_Negative_About_Christianity%E2%80%99s_Supposed_Decline_Recent_Research_into_World_Figures/). I sure do! I love the myth. It is better than that Santa and Easter bunny nonsense! It changed my life, and I am thankful.
Bob seems to assume atheism has come up with a better explanation for the origins of our universe. They haven’t. Some of us consider the idea that the universe self-created or something came from nothing as childish and naïve. It is pretty childish to me to suggest that because we have sent unmanned space crafts into our solar system and a touch beyond, that we can now deduce there is no God. Really Bob? Get real. We can’t even get to the nearest star-system beyond our sun (http://www.universetoday.com/15403/how-long-would-it-take-to-travel-to-the-nearest-star/). What do we know about what is out there? Bob’s understanding of the Christian God is also deeply flawed. Thinking Christians don’t believe God lashes out with natural disasters; rather, he gives himself in love for a world he will not give up on. He won’t give up on Bob either.
I wonder if Bob has considered whether there is a link between this great nation we love and cherish and the song we sing? Could it be that the God of nations, despite the antipathy of some in our midst, has heard our prayer as it has been sung, and has acted in his gentle loving manner to shape NZ into what it is? Could it be that the prosperity Bob himself enjoys (good for him), is in part, a result of God working among us?
Nations need symbols. They need reminders of what formed them. They need to be bought back again and again to their core and original values. They shouldn’t just throw them out because some in the nation have a change of values. Neither is it about national pride, it is about wanting to be in a nation that is full of goodness and love, in which people can freely state what they believe (however wrong, wink wink), and enjoy peace and prosperity. I will keep singing and praying for that.
Bob finishes with his final swing—having a crack at the gay community. Really Bob? Is that the best you’ve got? I say keep the Anthem, sing it more, sing it often, and mean it. Perhaps if more Kiwis lived it soulfully we would be even greater? Whatever, in a world that is dangerous, we need all the help we can get. Is it time. Not in my humble opinion.
Bob clearly set out to offend when he wrote the article. He begins by slamming the Australian song, claiming that Australia is not “young and free.” His basis is that Australia, NZ etc. are actually old nations in world terms. Well, in strict socio-political terms he may be right, but he misses the point. When one sings an anthem like this, one is not singing the latest pop song expressing how things are now, one sings a song that speaks of the founding principles of a nation, those ideals upon which the nation is built. It expresses the desire and sense of the nation then. It functions as a reminder, a link with history, our forebears giving their all to establish a people and singing a song that encapsulates present hope and future dreams. It works to stop us renouncing those cherished values—which is exactly what Bob wants us all to do. For what Bob? Materialism?
He then has a crack at the “bloody haka” as a “national embarrassment.” Really Bob? An embarrassment? Isn’t it rather glorious that the people of NZ have embraced Māori culture to the point that we are defined as much by the haka as by the anthem. Sure, it is overdone at times. But come on. I think it is a sign of our progress to finding our identity and unity as a nation that the “glorious haka” is now a central symbol of our life. Bob sounds like a tired old Euro-centric modernist to me.
He then turns his attention to the anthem. He seems annoyed with the manner of choosing the anthem, through a contest in an Australian-owned paper decided by Australians and Germans. Here we have more than another tinge of racism; after all, our history is intertwined with Australia and the colonialists came from Europe. The mundane name “Bob Jones” proves the point.
His diatribe pauses to slam God save the Queen because it lacks an object, “from what?” Here we of course have a case of metonymy whereby “Queen” represents the monarch and her people, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. It includes us actually. “From what?” Are you serious Bob? A glance over history suggests things like wars (remember Hitler?), economic recession, plague, oppressive rule, and more. We need God’s help now as much as ever.
His problems with the anthem are first, that it’s over the top lyrics. Personally, I love the lyrics, they express great hope. What is wrong with expressing our dreams for a blessed nation that is good and great, characterised by love, truth, freedom, peace, racial unity, honor and prosperity, and that we do not fall prey to dissension, envy, hate, and corruption? Bob seems to find the anthem boastful. It is not, it is a prayer that we will be great, an expression of human desire for the things listed above.
Bob is upset about our failure to uphold peace. Here he has a point. But rather than us then ditching the anthem, why not ditch violence and try and live the anthem and its desires? If we haven’t lived up to it, instead of abandoning it and settling for something less, shouldn’t we then sing it more in the hope that we get its point and work even harder for peace?
Then Bob gets to his real issue, the God-talk in the Anthem. For Bob, God is a “mythical entity” and embarrassing. For an atheist, I suppose it would be. He quotes Einstein, “religion is simply childish.
Well it may come as a surprise to Bob, that there are many scientists who beg to differ from Einstein. Furthermore, the majority of the world remains childish and believes in the myth (http://www.laidlaw.ac.nz/_blog/Our_Blog/post/Should_We_Be_So_Negative_About_Christianity%E2%80%99s_Supposed_Decline_Recent_Research_into_World_Figures/). I sure do! I love the myth. It is better than that Santa and Easter bunny nonsense! It changed my life, and I am thankful.
Bob seems to assume atheism has come up with a better explanation for the origins of our universe. They haven’t. Some of us consider the idea that the universe self-created or something came from nothing as childish and naïve. It is pretty childish to me to suggest that because we have sent unmanned space crafts into our solar system and a touch beyond, that we can now deduce there is no God. Really Bob? Get real. We can’t even get to the nearest star-system beyond our sun (http://www.universetoday.com/15403/how-long-would-it-take-to-travel-to-the-nearest-star/). What do we know about what is out there? Bob’s understanding of the Christian God is also deeply flawed. Thinking Christians don’t believe God lashes out with natural disasters; rather, he gives himself in love for a world he will not give up on. He won’t give up on Bob either.
I wonder if Bob has considered whether there is a link between this great nation we love and cherish and the song we sing? Could it be that the God of nations, despite the antipathy of some in our midst, has heard our prayer as it has been sung, and has acted in his gentle loving manner to shape NZ into what it is? Could it be that the prosperity Bob himself enjoys (good for him), is in part, a result of God working among us?
Nations need symbols. They need reminders of what formed them. They need to be bought back again and again to their core and original values. They shouldn’t just throw them out because some in the nation have a change of values. Neither is it about national pride, it is about wanting to be in a nation that is full of goodness and love, in which people can freely state what they believe (however wrong, wink wink), and enjoy peace and prosperity. I will keep singing and praying for that.
Bob finishes with his final swing—having a crack at the gay community. Really Bob? Is that the best you’ve got? I say keep the Anthem, sing it more, sing it often, and mean it. Perhaps if more Kiwis lived it soulfully we would be even greater? Whatever, in a world that is dangerous, we need all the help we can get. Is it time. Not in my humble opinion.
Comments
all folkѕ you гeаlly know what yоu're talking approximately! Bookmarked. Please also discuss with my site =). We could have a link alternate contract between us
Also visit my blog : bodylastics review
to give it a look. I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm
book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers!
Wonderful blog and excellent design.
Here is my web-site; www.prweb.com
Here is my webpage ; viviscal scalp lotion
and yes, the line will waver depending on the woman. [url=http://www.icanadagooseca.com]canada goose chilliwack bomber[/url] The base comes as a powder or as a loose powder compact powder. [url=http://officialcanadagoosesoutlet.ca]canada goose parka sale[/url]
[url=http://flyballbags.com]canada goose down jackets[/url] Alexander McQueen Andre Leon Talley Andy Warhol Anna Wintour Annie Leibovitz Aritzia Beauty Beyond Bill Cunningham Black Friday Chanel China Christian Dior Concerts Dance Diddy DVF Edie Sedgwick Editorial Elle Evergy Fashion Fashion Fashion Week Favourites Frazzled Friends Fur Fusions Gareth Pugh Georgio Armani Glamazon GQ Grace Coddington Harpers Bazaar HHSML Icon Inspirations Isaac Mizrahi Jason Wu John Galliano Katy Perry Kazaky Lanvin Louis Vuitton LOVE Madame Gres Magdalena Frackowiak Marc Jacobs Memorial Missoni Movie Review Music Natalia Vodianova NC photography New York Times Paris Fashion Week Personal Style Photographer Photography Quotations quotes Resort Rihanna Robyn Runway Reviews Sarah Burton Sarah Dharshi Spring/Summer Street Style Street Style The Factory This day in history This day in history Topshop Trends Turbans Vena Cava Vintage Finds Vogue Vogue Korea Voguing Zara [url=http://www.onlinebeatsbydreoutlet.com]buy fake beats by dre solo[/url]
They need the lubrication of cheap oil. [url=http://www.icanadagooseca.com]canada goose chilliwack bomber[/url] So, there are numerous people who are fond of wearing them such as basketball shoes, running shoes as well as volleyball shoes and so on. [url=http://officialcanadagoosesoutlet.ca]canada goose[/url]
[url=http://flyballbags.com]canada goose down jackets[/url] Um didn't Wanted just make a lot of money and aren't people saying it is going to end up being the surprise hit of the summer? And correct me if I am wrong, but how many huge hits outside of Batman Begins and DK (forgone conclusion) has DC had at the movie theater lately? How about none? And how many people hated SR? Just a few. [url=http://www.onlinebeatsbydreoutlet.com]buy beats by dre online[/url]
な成長を遂げている異常なグループです
Check out my blog post; ミュウミュウ
ータキシード
が広い肩や背の高い男性と男性のための優れ
た選択肢です。同様に短い身長である筋
肉の男性のた
めだけでなくショールタキシード作品の
スタイル。ジャ
ケットのシングルボタン
スタイルは胴体
が長くなるように見え
るのに役立ちます
し、外観は、ずんぐりした男性
が薄く見えるの
に役立ちます。ショールタ
キシードを注文時に右の適合を得
ることが重要である。発注のための測定と
サイズチャー
トを服用については、当社の測定情報のセクションを読
む
Here is my site :: コーチ 財布
間で行われている
別の機会やイベントに合わせ
て製造されているフラ
ットの数がありますが例えばこれらの5月に
はプロムの夜パーティー集まりディナー結婚
式などが含まれる
Feel free to surf to my web-site: miumiu アウトレット
ドの安価なバージョンを開発
することを想像してみて
My site :: miumiu