Skip to main content

Singing to the Lord

I have just been to the gym and as I sat on the erg pulling away I was listening to Hillsong. Yes, Hillsong. In my circle of the faith, some people hear that name and smile appreciatively because of their love for Hillsong and their music. Others reach for a bucket, their grimaces betrayed their deep abhorrence of their music and all things Hillsong.

I do have some problems with Hillsong. Their theology is over-realised to a large degree. They sing of the already of the Kingdom too much and do not take much cognicance of the 'not yet.' Thematically, they miss out a lot of themes which are important such as repentance, prayer, seeking forgiveness, unity, dimensions of mission etc. Their songs tend to be generic, pop worship has to be, to gain the largest market. Yet, aside from this imbalance, their music to me is astonishing.

My concern in this blog is not Hillsong, but the reaction against singing among many Christians today. I understand it. The way we sing is a problem, with a band at the front, performance driven in many cases, and the congregation appearing more as audience than participants. The songs are often lacking in depth, with repeated refrains and a shallow dealing with theology. This is forced by the genre of contemporary worship which has swung away from the hymic form of yesteryear.

We also sing a lot, and we repeat songs a lot. Our worship to me is imbalanced with an over-reliance on sung worship at the expense of prayer, sharing, etc. NT worship is hard to completely assess as we do not have a huge amount to go on, but certainly in 1 Cor 14 we have church in homes, based around meals with the Lord's Supper, and a charismatic sharing of gifts (esp. v.26). Actually, singing worship is not mentioned in the Gospels except in regards to the infancy narrative in Luke with the songs of Zechariah, Mary, Simeon and the shepherds, those singing as Jesus entered Jerusalem on a donkey and the hymn sung as they went out from the Last Supper. It can be assumed that the disciples and Jesus sang as he went to the synagogue as was his custom. I am sure as they sat around at night around the camp fires and in the homes of people as they travelled through Palestine, they sang. Yes, it is fair to critique the over-reliance and nature of sung worship. It is fair to challenge the weak theology. It is fair to ask questions and look to restructure worship.

Yet, we go too far when we want to throw out singing. The Psalms are replete with commands to sing. We have determinations from the Psalmists that they 'will sing' no matter what the suffering and circumstance. The NT affirms singing. We find Paul and Silas singing in a Philippian jail, witnessing as they worshiped God on the Sabbath at midnight. Luke appears to link their miraculous release to this event, he often linking prayer to the miraculous. Paul speaks of singing in 1 Cor 14; determines to sing with his spirit and mind; that Gentiles will sing in Rom 15; inserts hymns into his letters like Phil 2:6-11; Col 1:15-20; Eph 5:14; 1 Tim 3:16; encourages believers to sing in OT psalms, new Christian hymns and spontaneous and other Spirit-led songs. Revelation is fulll of glorious songs of praise.

So we go too far when we repudiate singing. We miss the glory of the modern song movement. I find it hard to believe that God is in heaven hating people singing to him. There are examples of God being offended by worship in the OT (e.g. Amos, Is 1). Yet these relate not to the worship itself, but the failure of the worshipers to live the covenant and especially show deep concern for the needy. Their worship had become vertical and not horizontal. I believe what upsets God more is not whether we sing too much or get the songs just right or the balance perfect; but what we do when we leave. Do we care for the needy? Are we radically generous? Are our hearts right? Are we committed to living out our faith in obedience and humility? Are we hypocrites or true worshipers. There should be no disjunction between our Sunday worship and the other 166 hours of the week.

Personally, I think God loves it when people come into his presence intentionally and pour out their lives to him. We should not baulk at emotion in worship as people raise their hands and pour out their hearts to God. We are called to love God with all of our beings? We should not be concerned when believers play skillfully to the Lord, seek to please him with the brilliance of their worship, sing well, play well. But we should be concerned when we idolise these things and performance obscures worship.

Over all I think we should sing less, we should restructure our worship spaces so that God is the audience and not the band. Mind you I do not get into sitting looking at other people, I find that really distracting. I want to face an empty front of a church maybe with a worship leader and the band to one side. I think we should have more prayer, more sharing, more open space, more silence, more songs of depth, more interaction, more dynamics in the service than we do.

But I don't want to come to church to analyse every week, to tear apart the songs, critique the sermon, rebuke the worship leader, and generally be a critic of worship. I want to participate and give God some real glory. So I choose to. Often the worship is not that great. Sometimes it is. Sometimes I am leading it, but I do so now in fear and trembling because I know it is faultering and weak. Yet, I think God does not analyse my prayers, he hears them holistically. He response to humans reaching for him, even if the expression is not perfect. So, as for me, I will sing to the Lord.

This was stimulated by a verse I had never noticed before. It is Deuteronomy 28:47: 'Because you did not serve the Lord your God joyfully and with gladness of heart for the abundance of everything, therefore you shall serve your enemies whom the Lord will send against you, in hunger and thirst, in nakedness, and lacking everything...' There is a link here between a failure to come to God in joy and gladness with exile and oppression. I want to continue to come to God openly. I will do so through the songs of Hillsong, Vineyard, Matt Redman, and more. Have I got this right?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Imagine if you got rid of overheads and the worshipers learnt songs thru being present and hearing, slowing becoming more involved in the body of worshiping believers, imagine then that they would be words imprinted on the hearts and minds, imagine then that the songs would become prayers and incence, imagine then that it might be participation in lifting praise to Almighty God, imagine then that rather than a sing-along designed to create emotion it would become a pouring out of all that hearts contained ... and if you wanted to or felt the need imagine just being able to sit there in silence letting the praise of those hearts wash over you and heal you till you to absorbed the words and lifted face hands and heart to the One who needs it not but knows the grace that it releases.
Mark J. Keown said…
To me George, that is unworkable. From the beginning worship was not just for believers and was open to the uninitiated and unbelievers who would now know the songs (1 Cor 14:16, 20-25). Paul urges the Corinthians to do all they can to make the worship appropriate and understandable including limiting the use of tongues. So, for me, that is not an option in an open worship service. Ultimately that is the hope of course. I am not sure that this does not happen even with current structures, it does for me, I choose to worship in this way. I have learnt them, I do sing them as prayers. I suppose I don't quite get why it is not like that for others. Is it because they have chosen to take the position of a critic instead of a participant? For me, I enter a worship situation and just commit to connecting with God and sing, pray, listen, reflect as I sense I should. Nothing wrong with emotion, we are called to worship God with our hearts, souls, minds and strength; I am equally concerned about emotionless worship. I am concerned about manipulating emotion, but again that is about perception. I choose to worship with my whole being. Yes, there is a need for more silence. But again, I love the worship. In my church if you sit in silence all you hear is car noises, stereos, sirens and screeching tyres! I prefer the music anytime! You are truly a contemplative in your preferences. To me it comes back to consumerism. Are we there to bag the quality of the customer service or to join in no matter what the modes of worship? For me it is the latter? Am I there to have my preferences met or to participate willingly in loving God with all my being whatever the offering? For me it is the latter. I can find other times for silence, or alternatively, wack the car stereo on and rock to sung worship. It seems always to come back to consumerism? For me the true worshiper loves to gather with God's people and worship and is less concerned about the mode as with the God they worship. There is no one form that is right and perfect. We should worship him in spirit and in truth and I will not be one of those spectators who critiques. I will participate. I may not sing every song. I may not like every song. I may sit when others stand. I may kneel. But I will worship God because that is what he wants. And I will seek to live a consistent life 24/7. It is about him not me.
Mark J. Keown said…
Actually, it is not only what he wants, but what he deserves. He is worthy and I will sing the heart songs of others to him, I will pray, I will listen, I will drink of him, I will eat of the bread of life. Why? Because he is glorious, he is grace, he is wonderful, he is supreme. That is the only right response. I will not stand in judgement over others' songs and styles... I will worship.
Anonymous said…
Hey I am not suggesting it would work as I know it would not, there are to many variables to allow that sort of format to work .... and inherantly there is nothing wrong with overheads (unless your short and standing behind me) I just think that much of what is sung is glib (that is purely a personal opionion and my problem) I also confess to being a tad negative towards hype as my own faith is so often devoid of emotion that I think I tend to begrudge the connection that others experiance. I think we agree on one thing tho and that is looking for and seeking the balance, no problem in raising the rafters in exhaltation if it is balanced with a degree of introspection. Maybe I think there is a danger that if we focus so much on pouring out we run out of time to absorb in .... there is a danger in putting God on a pedastal to worship (for our own pleasure) cause He just does not fit in such a small confine, He is beyond our comprehension and after we empty out is that maybe not an apt time to allow God to fill us with all He deems we can absorb at that time according to His grace.

You know I am not arguing against you or even with you, but there seem so few places to have these chances to discuss such things.

Silence need not be an interlude bewteen worship and the service nor does silence mean being inactive .... silence to can be a form of worship if that is where the Spirit leads.

I also think that silence is a skill that maybe needs to be taught, do many churches today have a silence leader as many do worship leaders. I dont know maybe the Psalms are as informative about contemplation as the are singing ..... now I am getting picky so apologies and bye for now :D
Anonymous said…
Hi theгe сollеаgueѕ,
how is the whοle thіng, аnԁ ωhat
yоu dеsire to sау regarԁing this рοst, іn my view
its actuallу аmazing in favor of me.


Feеl free to ѕuгf to my
ωеbpage ... what is hcg injections for weight loss

Popular posts from this blog

Ten Reasons Why A.J. Miller is NOT Jesus!

Note: Forgive me for the long blog, but this one really got me going! Last Sunday night on TV One's Sunday aired the report A.J. The Messiah. The program was the story of A.J. Miller in Queensland in Australia, who, unlike most of us, genuinely believes that he is Jesus. Miller appears at one level to be a normal Aussie bloke, in his early thirties, longish brown hair, unshaven, good looking, articulate and charismatic. Yet, unlike anyone I know but in the manner of other Messiah-claimants, he says without inhibition, "I am actually Jesus." He claims to remember vividly his former life and death including his experience of crucifixion. The memories supposedly began when he was 2 years old and realised later that he was Jesus around 33. In the program he writes on a white-board, "I am Jesus. Deal with it"—to applause from his congregation. He has disciples, some of whom claim to have been with him 2000 years ago including Mary Magdalene who is his "soul-ma

Tribute to Stuart Lange

For anyone who is interested, I have attached my tribute to Rev Stuart Lange here. He is a legend! It was fun to roast him.... A Tribute to Stuart Lange, No Longer Vice Principal Community of Laidlaw… But still church history lecturer… so not a good bye, but my way of Saying Thanks to you for your years as VP Community… Stuart Lange, not Langey; or Longey; or not langgggg.. but Lange! Or, as I like to put it, S.lang… Slang… for good reason. Stuart Lange, history prof, a man who truly embodies his subject; the quintessential historical prof… Slightly eccentric, crooked smile, hooked and bent nose… you know he has a crook elbow too, took the dog for a walk, hit the chain, smashed the elbow… Of course the dog was unharmed… No Surprise, a lover of animals, each year looking after the animals at the Massey Christmas drive through, donkeys, lamas… etc… Then there is his Einsteinlich hair… kind of a wild man of Southland look… in fact… Stuart Lange A face a cartoonist would die for! The ne

Evangelical Presbyterians’ Statement On Same Sex Marriage

I am involved in a group called Presbyterian Affirm. It is an evangelical group within the NZ Presbyterian Church which seeks to promote the gospel and the renewal of churches. A group of us under the leadership of Stuart Lange have worked to put together a statement on same-sex marriage. Our hope is that the government will not pass the legislation, believing that the legislation is not necessary and strays from God’s ideals for humanity. Here is the recently released statement. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. PRESBYTERIAN GROUP OPPOSES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BILL Presbyterian AFFIRM, a widely-supported conservative network within the Presbyterian denomination, is speaking out against the Bill which would allow same-sex couples to marry, declaring its views in a “Statement on Marriage” (see below). Presbyterian AFFIRM believes that “marriage is a unique human institution and treasure” which has “always been about the pairing of a man and a woman”, and that re-definin