Brian Tamaki is in the news again, this time questioning the statement on diversity on the basis that NZ is a Christian country. So what does the statement say?
Statement on Religious Diversity
New Zealand is a country of many faiths with a significant minority who profess no religion. Increasing religious diversity is a significant feature of public life.
At the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840, Governor Hobson affirmed, in response to a question from Catholic Bishop Pompallier, "the several faiths (beliefs) of England, of the Wesleyans, of Rome, and also Maori custom shall alike be protected". This foundation creates the opportunity to reaffirm an acknowledgement of the diversity of beliefs in New Zealand.
Christianity has played and continues to play a formative role in the development of New Zealand in terms of the nation's identity, culture, beliefs, institutions and values.
New settlers have always been religiously diverse, but only recently have the numbers of some of their faith communities grown significantly as a result of migration from Asia, Africa and the Middle East. These communities have a positive role to play in our society. It is in this context that we recognise the right to religion and the responsibilities of religious communities.
International treaties including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights uphold the right to freedom of religion and belief - the right to hold a belief; the right to change one's religion or belief; the right to express one's religion or belief; and the right not to hold a belief. These rights are reflected in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and Human Rights Act. The right to religion entails affording this right to others and not infringing their human rights.
The following statement provides a framework for the recognition of New Zealand's diverse faith communities and their harmonious interaction with each other, with government and with other groups in society:
1. The State and Religion: The State seeks to treat all faith communities and those who profess no religion equally before the law. New Zealand has no official or established religion.
2. The Right to Religion: New Zealand upholds the right to freedom of religion and belief and the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of religious or other belief.
3. The Right to Safety: Faith communities and their members have a right to safety and security.
4. The Right of Freedom of Expression: The right to freedom of expression and freedom of the media are vital for democracy but should be exercised with responsibility.
5. Recognition and Accommodation: Reasonable steps should be taken in educational and work environments and in the delivery of public services to recognise and accommodate diverse religious beliefs and practices.
6. Education: Schools should teach an understanding of different religious and spiritual traditions in a manner that reflects the diversity of their national and local community.
7. Religious Differences: Debate and disagreement about religious beliefs will occur but must be exercised within the rule of law and without resort to violence.
8. Cooperation and understanding: Government and faith communities have a responsibility to build and maintain positive relationships with each other, and to promote mutual respect and understanding.
So should we as Christians uphold the notion that we are a Christian nation or should be uphold the principles of the statement?
As I see it, we are not a Christian nation and have never been. In fact, I would argue that the notion of a 'Christian nation' does not and has never existed. There are Christian people and the Christian church made up of the community of Christians. Beyond that, it is debatable that anything is 'Christian'. Sure, Christianity played a massive role in the formation of our nation; its justice and ethics etc. But it was never a Christian state.
I would also question whether we would ever want it to be a Christian state. Where state and church come together has often led to problems as Christianity became caught up in war and the imposition of belief on others.
At the coming of Christ, the focus of God shifted from a nation (Israel) to the person of Christ to a newly consituted people who are those who have faith in Christ and not any one nation. We as a nation have no covenant with God as a nation, but through faith in Christ.
At the essence of the gospel is freedom; freedom to believe or reject the faith. Christianity is by definition the gathering of people from all states aside from the state. We should respect deeply the rights of all to believe or disbelieve while proclaiming that a failure to believe will bring negative consequences while belief will bring salvation and eternal life.
I differ then with Brian Tamaki while I deeply respect his zeal and commitment but I think her errs in reading the OT principles of national covenant with God into the new era of nations like our own. I approve of the statement; I think it is fair. But I do agree that our Christian heritage should be more highly valued and honoured!