Skip to main content

1 Peter 3:1–7 as One Evangelistic Paradigm


When talking about evangelism, one of my favorite questions I love to ask people is this: “where in the NT is there a situation where an evangelist tells others to be silent concerning their faith?”

Most believe that such a verse does not exist. Yet, there is one place at least. (Two, if you count Acts 16:6--10). 

The passage is 1 Peter 3:1–2. It lies in the section 1 Pet 2:13 to 3:7 which is a kind of household code, or better, a civic code; a guide to the readers how to live in relationship to authority from the Roman Imperial authorities to within family structures. Peter urges all of his readers from Asia Minor to be in submission to the Empire and honoring of Caesar (which is astonishing when one considers at this point, he was going off his nut and would soon persecute Christians and kill Peter and Paul!).

He then urges the household servants to be submissive to their masters. 

In 3:1–7, Peter focuses on wives and husbands. In the ancient world, husbands ruled the home as the paterfamilias. Peter urges the wives to live in a culturally appropriate manner, living in gracious submission to their husbands. He then states that “so that even if some do not obey the word (logos), through the conduct of their wives they may be won without a word (logos) when they see your respectful and pure conduct.” The rest of the passage builds on this urging them not to focus on their external image, but “the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit” (v. 5).

I am going to leave aside the ongoing questions raised by this passage for wives submitting to husbands and focus on the evangelistic import of this passage. 

Those of us who take the Bible seriously as a guide for life know that we are called to share the faith, right? We are regularly encouraged to share our faith seeking to convince people to believe in Jesus. The Great Commission passages endorse that this is central to God’s purposes on planet earth (Matt 28:18–20; Luke 24:46–49; John 20:21; Acts 1:8). So, as we go out into our workplaces, schools, universities, sports clubs and other social settings, we are to share Christ with the world. We are urged to do so verbally, articulating the gospel to the lost. In fact, we can sometimes be so hard-pressed to do this that we end up guilty if we do not share Christ with unbelievers every time we come into contact with an unbeliever!

So, how are we to go about it? Are we meant to knock on doors, preach on the streets, run programs like Alpha, have crusades with gifted evangelists, invite people to church, use apologetic arguments or engage in friendship evangelism? There is no doubt that all these strategies have their place as led by the Spirit and where appropriate. In each given context certain things work better than others and we are to allow God to show us the way in each setting.

In 1 Peter 3:1-2, Peter tells us that there is a time not to share the gospel verbally and focus on giving witness through the quality of our lives. In describing these husbands as those who “do not obey the word,” we can assume he is talking about unbelievers who have at some point heard the gospel but have rejected it. So, rather than continuing to share Christ verbally in such instances, Peter instructs readers to seek to win them “without a word” through the quality of their lives. They are to live the gospel in front of these unbelievers so that they may come to realize that there truly is a God who loves them. In other words, they know that their husbands have heard the message, so now they must let them see the message in their lives.

To me this has implications for evangelism in a place like NZ where a good number of people have at some time or another heard the gospel and rejected it. Where this is the case, rather than continue to relentlessly preach the word to them in the hope of haranguing them to faith, rather, we need to demonstrate the word so that they can see God in our lives.

This is very important for those of us who are Christians in long-term relationships with people in our families, workplaces, and other social settings. We should not assume we have to bring Christ into every conversation. Rather, we must be very sensitive to the context. We are to share the gospel of course, but the question is “how in this situation?”

The passage also challenges us to get to know those people in our context. Are they Christians? If not, have they heard the Christian message clearly? If not, then we look for a Spirit-given opportunity, and we share. If they have heard the gospel and are in reaction against it, then our challenge is not to push it down their throats, but share it with lives that truly reflect the value system of God: love, gentleness, patience, holiness, joy, peace, goodness, kindness, humility, servant-heartedness, honesty, authenticity, integrity, and so on. We are to treat people as we would long to be treated.

Such passages endorse that we are to share the gospel. The thing is how in each situation. We must be prayerful, great listeners, ready to share (1 Pet 3:15–16), yet also uber-sensitive to the situation we are in and respond appropriately. Sometimes we will stay quiet because the word is already implanted. We share Christ in our attitudes and good deeds. At other times, we dare to share the gospel verbally. Either way, we are to be Spirit-led.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ten Reasons Why A.J. Miller is NOT Jesus!

Note: Forgive me for the long blog, but this one really got me going! Last Sunday night on TV One's Sunday aired the report A.J. The Messiah. The program was the story of A.J. Miller in Queensland in Australia, who, unlike most of us, genuinely believes that he is Jesus. Miller appears at one level to be a normal Aussie bloke, in his early thirties, longish brown hair, unshaven, good looking, articulate and charismatic. Yet, unlike anyone I know but in the manner of other Messiah-claimants, he says without inhibition, "I am actually Jesus." He claims to remember vividly his former life and death including his experience of crucifixion. The memories supposedly began when he was 2 years old and realised later that he was Jesus around 33. In the program he writes on a white-board, "I am Jesus. Deal with it"—to applause from his congregation. He has disciples, some of whom claim to have been with him 2000 years ago including Mary Magdalene who is his "soul-ma

Tribute to Stuart Lange

For anyone who is interested, I have attached my tribute to Rev Stuart Lange here. He is a legend! It was fun to roast him.... A Tribute to Stuart Lange, No Longer Vice Principal Community of Laidlaw… But still church history lecturer… so not a good bye, but my way of Saying Thanks to you for your years as VP Community… Stuart Lange, not Langey; or Longey; or not langgggg.. but Lange! Or, as I like to put it, S.lang… Slang… for good reason. Stuart Lange, history prof, a man who truly embodies his subject; the quintessential historical prof… Slightly eccentric, crooked smile, hooked and bent nose… you know he has a crook elbow too, took the dog for a walk, hit the chain, smashed the elbow… Of course the dog was unharmed… No Surprise, a lover of animals, each year looking after the animals at the Massey Christmas drive through, donkeys, lamas… etc… Then there is his Einsteinlich hair… kind of a wild man of Southland look… in fact… Stuart Lange A face a cartoonist would die for! The ne

Evangelical Presbyterians’ Statement On Same Sex Marriage

I am involved in a group called Presbyterian Affirm. It is an evangelical group within the NZ Presbyterian Church which seeks to promote the gospel and the renewal of churches. A group of us under the leadership of Stuart Lange have worked to put together a statement on same-sex marriage. Our hope is that the government will not pass the legislation, believing that the legislation is not necessary and strays from God’s ideals for humanity. Here is the recently released statement. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. PRESBYTERIAN GROUP OPPOSES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BILL Presbyterian AFFIRM, a widely-supported conservative network within the Presbyterian denomination, is speaking out against the Bill which would allow same-sex couples to marry, declaring its views in a “Statement on Marriage” (see below). Presbyterian AFFIRM believes that “marriage is a unique human institution and treasure” which has “always been about the pairing of a man and a woman”, and that re-definin