Skip to main content

The Cost of Revelation: Paul’s thorn in the flesh and Jacob’s Hip (2 Cor 12)
Recently, I was considering Paul’s thorn in the flesh. We don’t know what it is of course. Ralph Martin in his 2014 revision of his Word Commentary on 2 Corinthians notes these possibilities.

1.      Opponents (Chrysostom, Martin).
2.      Sexual temptation (Medieval thinkers from Gregory the Great to Aquinas)
3.      Spiritual temptation (Calvin, Luther, and other Reformers)
4.      Agony that people reject the gospel (Menoud)
5.      Suffering from his rejection as an apostle (McCant)
6.      A pain in the ear or head (Tertullian, Jerome, Pelagius)
7.      An eye-condition (commonly, e.g. Witherington)
8.      Epilepsy (Lightfoot)
9.      Malaria (Ramsay)
10.   Nervous disorder (Clavier)
11.   Defective speech (Clark, Barrett)

In my view, as it is referred to as a weakness or illness (astheneia) in v. 9, I suspect it is not something external but some physical or psychological hindrance. Hence, I have grouped the possibilities 6–11 together. It may be linked to the criticism of his opponents referred to in 2 Cor 10:10: “his physical presence is weak (asthenēs) and his speech is of no account.” If so, it is likely something observable to others. It could be a speech impediment like stuttering, or, some form of disability observable to others. In a world where imperfections were often attributed to a person’s sin and enamored with perfection of form, Paul’s opponents may have used this in various ways to demean him.

Whatever it was, and God alone truly knows, what interests me in this blog is not the exact nature of the thorn, but its relationship to his spiritual revelation and a comparison that can be arguably made with Jacob.

Paul’s suffering from the thorn is placed after his amazing visionary experience of 2 Corinthians 12:1–6. The passage is a part of Paul’s boast against his opponents. They are clearly Jewish people who value greatly spiritual experience. Paul’s boast is ironical. He does not like boasting other than in Christ (2 Cor 10:17), but, as his opponents are boastful and demeaning him, he turns their tactics back on them. In 2 Cor 11:16 taking on the foolishness of boasting, he boasts of his Jewish descent (11:22) and his suffering as he serves Christ (11:23–33).

Despite there being nothing gained by boasting, he goes on. He turns to his spiritual experiences. He uses the third person to distance himself from the person in mind who is clearly himself. He speaks of an experience some fourteen years prior (ca. AD 43 [M. Harris]) in which he was caught up into the heavens and heard unimaginable things. We can only speculate on what he experienced, but it was clearly amazing.

In 2 Cor 12:7, Paul speaks of his thorn. It is given to keep him from being arrogant (NET) because of this amazing spiritual experience. He interprets it as a messenger (angelos) of Satan. For Paul, its origin and cause are demonic. Despite Paul thrice asking God to remove it, God refused, telling him that his grace was sufficient and that his power would be made perfect in Paul’s weakness. God’s power is seen in him, despite this problem. 

One can say then that Paul,  the price of his amazing spiritual experience is God striking him through Satan to cause him suffering that is ongoing. God deemed it important to strike him with a weakness to ensure he did not fall prey to the arrogance that can come to those who genuinely believe that God has gifted them with an experience other people have not had. This type of spiritual arrogance is frequent among the greatly gifted of God’s people (a warning to us who have such experiences to remain humble and not think of ourselves more highly than we ought).

This all made me think of Jacob and his experience of God near the ford of the Jabbok in Gen 32:22–32). In this memorable event, Jacob was alone by the river. A man came and wrestled with him. The man was unable to defeat Jacob, so touched Jacob’s hip causing it to be put out of joint. Jacob would still not let the man go despite him asking him to do so. On the basis of his contention with the man, he renamed Jacob “Israel,” meaning “He fights with God” or “God fights.” Jacob sought the man’s name, but he refused. The place was named Peniel (face of God). As a result of this, Jews do not eat the sinew of the thigh on the hip socket. For Jacob, then, the price of his experience of God was a dislocation of his hip.

It seems that when one has a dramatic spiritual experience, it can be costly. In Paul’s case, it cost him some sort of ongoing suffering to keep him humble. For Jacob, he had a dislocated hip. Jesus, of course, had strings of spiritual experiences such as his baptism and Transfiguration. They cost him his life. Spiritual experiences are interesting and great; yet, they can come with a cost.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ten Reasons Why A.J. Miller is NOT Jesus!

Note: Forgive me for the long blog, but this one really got me going! Last Sunday night on TV One's Sunday aired the report A.J. The Messiah. The program was the story of A.J. Miller in Queensland in Australia, who, unlike most of us, genuinely believes that he is Jesus. Miller appears at one level to be a normal Aussie bloke, in his early thirties, longish brown hair, unshaven, good looking, articulate and charismatic. Yet, unlike anyone I know but in the manner of other Messiah-claimants, he says without inhibition, "I am actually Jesus." He claims to remember vividly his former life and death including his experience of crucifixion. The memories supposedly began when he was 2 years old and realised later that he was Jesus around 33. In the program he writes on a white-board, "I am Jesus. Deal with it"—to applause from his congregation. He has disciples, some of whom claim to have been with him 2000 years ago including Mary Magdalene who is his "soul-ma

Tribute to Stuart Lange

For anyone who is interested, I have attached my tribute to Rev Stuart Lange here. He is a legend! It was fun to roast him.... A Tribute to Stuart Lange, No Longer Vice Principal Community of Laidlaw… But still church history lecturer… so not a good bye, but my way of Saying Thanks to you for your years as VP Community… Stuart Lange, not Langey; or Longey; or not langgggg.. but Lange! Or, as I like to put it, S.lang… Slang… for good reason. Stuart Lange, history prof, a man who truly embodies his subject; the quintessential historical prof… Slightly eccentric, crooked smile, hooked and bent nose… you know he has a crook elbow too, took the dog for a walk, hit the chain, smashed the elbow… Of course the dog was unharmed… No Surprise, a lover of animals, each year looking after the animals at the Massey Christmas drive through, donkeys, lamas… etc… Then there is his Einsteinlich hair… kind of a wild man of Southland look… in fact… Stuart Lange A face a cartoonist would die for! The ne

Evangelical Presbyterians’ Statement On Same Sex Marriage

I am involved in a group called Presbyterian Affirm. It is an evangelical group within the NZ Presbyterian Church which seeks to promote the gospel and the renewal of churches. A group of us under the leadership of Stuart Lange have worked to put together a statement on same-sex marriage. Our hope is that the government will not pass the legislation, believing that the legislation is not necessary and strays from God’s ideals for humanity. Here is the recently released statement. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. PRESBYTERIAN GROUP OPPOSES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BILL Presbyterian AFFIRM, a widely-supported conservative network within the Presbyterian denomination, is speaking out against the Bill which would allow same-sex couples to marry, declaring its views in a “Statement on Marriage” (see below). Presbyterian AFFIRM believes that “marriage is a unique human institution and treasure” which has “always been about the pairing of a man and a woman”, and that re-definin