Skip to main content

The Sign of the Cross: Why did we do away with it?

I was at a worship gathering recently and we took communion. I observed a woman take the emblems and then make the sign of the cross. I found it a beautiful and poignant moment as she in deep sincerity, honored God in this way.

It then took my mind to the myriad of times I have seen others do the same in different settings. In silence, a person using the right hand (because Jesus sits at the right hand of the Father) touches the forehead, the center of the chest (the heart), and the two shoulders saying: “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, Amen.” (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=autaIzGDcy8).

It is used across a range of churches including the Orthodox, Catholic Churches, Anglicanism, and some Lutherans and Methodists. The idea is a very early one, found in Tertullian (De corona 3) who in the late second century says it was used on every journey, leaving the home, and at meals and bedtime (ISBE 1:287).   

As I thought on this profound act of worship by the woman, I pondered my own experience of the church which is largely Presbyterian and Baptist and wondered, “why on earth did we drop this?” It can hardly be seen as idolatrous. I suppose it could be seen as superstitious, but, then, is it any different from looking upward, raising hands, bowing in submission, or verbalizing a prayer? Not really, indeed, it is a lovely way to say a prayer non-verbally.

Some apparently don’t like the idea of invoking the full three-fold name of God, Father, Son, and Spirit, preferring “in the name of Jesus.” Yet, that seems downright weird considering that we are sent into the world to baptize people “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt 28:19). Probably, it is mainly rejected in many Protestant traditions because it is too Roman Catholic. While there are some ways in which I differ in my understanding from my Roman Catholic brothers and sisters in the faith, this is rubbish at many levels.

Hence, I suggest that we Protestants not familiar with using the sign of the cross should consider doing so. It is a beautiful and succinct way to express one’s worship. It identifies us as a Christian and hence it becomes an act of witness. It also invokes something in others. We shouldn’t do it pretentiously or to draw attention. It must be genuine, directed to God. When it is done from a sincere heart, it is a haunting and exquisite gesture of reverence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evangelical Presbyterians’ Statement On Same Sex Marriage

I am involved in a group called Presbyterian Affirm. It is an evangelical group within the NZ Presbyterian Church which seeks to promote the gospel and the renewal of churches. A group of us under the leadership of Stuart Lange have worked to put together a statement on same-sex marriage. Our hope is that the government will not pass the legislation, believing that the legislation is not necessary and strays from God’s ideals for humanity. Here is the recently released statement. I would appreciate your thoughts on it. PRESBYTERIAN GROUP OPPOSES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BILL Presbyterian AFFIRM, a widely-supported conservative network within the Presbyterian denomination, is speaking out against the Bill which would allow same-sex couples to marry, declaring its views in a “Statement on Marriage” (see below). Presbyterian AFFIRM believes that “marriage is a unique human institution and treasure” which has “always been about the pairing of a man and a woman”, and that re-def...

Ten Reasons Why A.J. Miller is NOT Jesus!

Note: Forgive me for the long blog, but this one really got me going! Last Sunday night on TV One's Sunday aired the report A.J. The Messiah. The program was the story of A.J. Miller in Queensland in Australia, who, unlike most of us, genuinely believes that he is Jesus. Miller appears at one level to be a normal Aussie bloke, in his early thirties, longish brown hair, unshaven, good looking, articulate and charismatic. Yet, unlike anyone I know but in the manner of other Messiah-claimants, he says without inhibition, "I am actually Jesus." He claims to remember vividly his former life and death including his experience of crucifixion. The memories supposedly began when he was 2 years old and realised later that he was Jesus around 33. In the program he writes on a white-board, "I am Jesus. Deal with it"—to applause from his congregation. He has disciples, some of whom claim to have been with him 2000 years ago including Mary Magdalene who is his "soul-ma...

Tribute to Stuart Lange

For anyone who is interested, I have attached my tribute to Rev Stuart Lange here. He is a legend! It was fun to roast him.... A Tribute to Stuart Lange, No Longer Vice Principal Community of Laidlaw… But still church history lecturer… so not a good bye, but my way of Saying Thanks to you for your years as VP Community… Stuart Lange, not Langey; or Longey; or not langgggg.. but Lange! Or, as I like to put it, S.lang… Slang… for good reason. Stuart Lange, history prof, a man who truly embodies his subject; the quintessential historical prof… Slightly eccentric, crooked smile, hooked and bent nose… you know he has a crook elbow too, took the dog for a walk, hit the chain, smashed the elbow… Of course the dog was unharmed… No Surprise, a lover of animals, each year looking after the animals at the Massey Christmas drive through, donkeys, lamas… etc… Then there is his Einsteinlich hair… kind of a wild man of Southland look… in fact… Stuart Lange A face a cartoonist would die for! The ne...